[PATCH v2 1/2] LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers

[Paul Moore]

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:28 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul,

/me waves

> On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 10:44 +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> > Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot
> > usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it
> > seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity,
> > switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename
> > the functions accordingly.
> >
> > Changelog v2
> > - Rebase to 'next-queued-testing'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen at gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
>
> The patches need to be upstreamed together.  Do you have any problems
> with my upstreaming them via linux-integrity?

Nope, I've been operating under the assumption that you would be
taking both patches via the linux-integrity tree.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com