[PATCH v2 1/2] LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers
Mimi Zohar
zohar at linux.ibm.com
Wed Jun 12 13:28:13 UTC 2019
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 10:44 +0300, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot
> usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it
> seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity,
> switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename
> the functions accordingly.
>
> Changelog v2
> - Rebase to 'next-queued-testing'
>
> Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen at gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
The patches need to be upstreamed together. Do you have any problems
with my upstreaming them via linux-integrity?
Mimi
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list