[PATCH 2/3] selinux: add checksum to policydb
Sebastien Buisson
sbuisson.ddn at gmail.com
Thu Apr 27 17:12:17 UTC 2017
2017-04-27 17:18 GMT+02:00 Stephen Smalley <sds at tycho.nsa.gov>:
> Ok, that should work as long as you just want to validate that all the
> clients loaded the same policy file, and aren't concerned about non-
> persistent policy boolean changes.
As far as I understand, non-persistent policy boolean changes can
affect the way the policy is enforced. So that is a problem if the
checksum does not reflect it. We want to protect against someone
tampering the policy locally on a Lustre client, even if it does not
survive a reboot.
I just checked, with the method of computing the checksum on a (data,
len) pair on entry to security_load_policy() the checksum does not
change after using setsebool. So it seems I would need to call
security_read_policy() to retrieve the binary representation of the
policy as currently enforced by the kernel. Unless you can see another
way?
> You needed to get (global) enforcing mode too, didn't you? That's
> separate from the policy.
Exactly, I also need to rework the patch I proposed about this, in
light of the comments I received.
> Make sure you make the hash algorithm explicit in both what is returned
> by the hook to lustre and by what is exported via selinuxfs. Can
> likely just encode the hash algorithm name in the string when you
> generate it.
Sure, I will add "sha256:" at the beginning of the string.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list