LSM: Replace secctx/len pairs with lsm_context

Paul Moore paul at paul-moore.com
Tue Dec 3 23:06:09 UTC 2024


On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 5:54 PM Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/3/2024 1:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 2:29 PM Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> >> Paul, do you want a revised patch set for the lsm_context change,
> >> or do you want to stick with what's in dev-staging?
> > I figured I would just move dev-staging over (I've already ported them
> > to v6.13-rc1 in my tree), but if you want to send out another patchset
> > I guess that's fine too.  Although looking at the related patches in
> > dev-staging right now, excluding the rust update from Alice, there is
> > only a kdoc fix (me), a signedness fix (Dan Carpenter), and then the
> > two fixes from you.  If you like, I can just squash your fixes into
> > the relevant patches since there is no authorship issue, and to be
> > frank I'm fine with squashing my kdoc fix too, which leaves us with
> > just Dan's fix ... which I think is okay~ish to leave standalone, but
> > if Dan's okay with squashing that I can do that too as it would be
> > preferable.  Dan?
> >
> > In case anyone is wondering, yes, squashing does take a little bit of
> > work on my end, but it borders on trivial, and it is much quicker than
> > re-reviewing a patchset.
>
> I figured that it could go either way. I won't resend. Thank you.

No problem.  Just to be clear, do I have your okay to squash your patches?

-- 
paul-moore.com



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list