LSM: Replace secctx/len pairs with lsm_context

Casey Schaufler casey at schaufler-ca.com
Tue Dec 3 22:54:28 UTC 2024


On 12/3/2024 1:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 2:29 PM Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>> Paul, do you want a revised patch set for the lsm_context change,
>> or do you want to stick with what's in dev-staging?
> I figured I would just move dev-staging over (I've already ported them
> to v6.13-rc1 in my tree), but if you want to send out another patchset
> I guess that's fine too.  Although looking at the related patches in
> dev-staging right now, excluding the rust update from Alice, there is
> only a kdoc fix (me), a signedness fix (Dan Carpenter), and then the
> two fixes from you.  If you like, I can just squash your fixes into
> the relevant patches since there is no authorship issue, and to be
> frank I'm fine with squashing my kdoc fix too, which leaves us with
> just Dan's fix ... which I think is okay~ish to leave standalone, but
> if Dan's okay with squashing that I can do that too as it would be
> preferable.  Dan?
>
> In case anyone is wondering, yes, squashing does take a little bit of
> work on my end, but it borders on trivial, and it is much quicker than
> re-reviewing a patchset.

I figured that it could go either way. I won't resend. Thank you.
I'll move on to the next phase, which is about auditing multiple LSM
attributes.





More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list