[PATCH v2] LSM: SafeSetID: fix UID printed instead of GID
Paul Moore
paul at paul-moore.com
Wed Jun 21 00:30:01 UTC 2023
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 2:34 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:13 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:50 PM Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
> > <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:59 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:44 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> > > > <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > pr_warn message clearly says that GID should be printed,
> > > > > but we have UID there. Let's fix that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Found accidentaly during the work on isolated user namespaces.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v2: __kuid_val -> __kgid_val
> > > > > ---
> > > > > security/safesetid/lsm.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > I'm assuming you're going to pick this up Micah?
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
> > >
> > > Dear Paul!
> > >
> > > Thanks for your review!
> > >
> > > Gentle ping to Micah Morton :-)
> >
> > Micah?
> >
> > The right thing would be for Micah to merge this via the SafeSetID
> > tree, however, considering that it's been over a month with no
> > response, and this patch looks trivially correct, I can pick this up
> > via the LSM tree if we don't see anything from Micah this week.
>
> Searching through all of the archives on lore I don't see any email
> from Micah past August of 2022. I'll still stick to the plan of
> merging this via the LSM tree next week if we don't see any response
> from Micah, but beyond this patch we may need to consider the
> possibility that Micah has moved on from SafeSetID.
>
> * https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=f%3Amortonm%40chromium.org
This fell through the cracks in my inbox last week, but I just went
ahead and merged this into lsm/next.
After the upcoming merge window closes we'll have to revisit
SafeSetID's status as "supported", we might need to demote it to
"maintained" or "odd fixes".
--
paul-moore.com
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list