[PATCH v2] LSM: SafeSetID: fix UID printed instead of GID

[Paul Moore]

On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:13 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:50 PM Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
> <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:59 PM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:44 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> > > <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > pr_warn message clearly says that GID should be printed,
> > > > but we have UID there. Let's fix that.
> > > >
> > > > Found accidentaly during the work on isolated user namespaces.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v2: __kuid_val -> __kgid_val
> > > > ---
> > > >  security/safesetid/lsm.c | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > I'm assuming you're going to pick this up Micah?
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
> >
> > Dear Paul!
> >
> > Thanks for your review!
> >
> > Gentle ping to Micah Morton :-)
>
> Micah?
>
> The right thing would be for Micah to merge this via the SafeSetID
> tree, however, considering that it's been over a month with no
> response, and this patch looks trivially correct, I can pick this up
> via the LSM tree if we don't see anything from Micah this week.

Searching through all of the archives on lore I don't see any email
from Micah past August of 2022.  I'll still stick to the plan of
merging this via the LSM tree next week if we don't see any response
from Micah, but beyond this patch we may need to consider the
possibility that Micah has moved on from SafeSetID.

 * https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=f%3Amortonm%40chromium.org

-- 
paul-moore.com