[PATCH v5 1/7] fs: introduce kernel_pread_file* support
zohar at kernel.org
Wed May 13 21:20:14 UTC 2020
On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 12:41 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> On 2020-05-13 12:39 p.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 12:18 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> >> On 2020-05-13 12:03 p.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 11:53 -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
> >> Even if the kernel successfully verified the firmware file signature it
> >> would just be wasting its time. The kernel in these use cases is not always
> >> trusted. The device needs to authenticate the firmware image itself.
> > There are also environments where the kernel is trusted and limits the
> > firmware being provided to the device to one which they signed.
> >>> The device firmware is being downloaded piecemeal from somewhere and
> >>> won't be measured?
> >> It doesn't need to be measured for current driver needs.
> > Sure the device doesn't need the kernel measuring the firmware, but
> > hardened environments do measure firmware.
> >> If someone has such need the infrastructure could be added to the kernel
> >> at a later date. Existing functionality is not broken in any way by
> >> this patch series.
> > Wow! You're saying that your patch set takes precedence over the
> > existing expectations and can break them.
> Huh? I said existing functionality is NOT broken by this patch series.
Assuming a system is configured to measure and appraise firmware
(rules below), with this change the firmware file will not be properly
measured and will fail signature verification.
Sample IMA policy rules:
appraise func=FIRMWARE_CHECK appraise_type=imasig
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive