mount.nfs: Protocol error after upgrade to linux/master

[Casey Schaufler]

On 3/16/2019 1:08 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2019/03/16 14:38, Kees Cook wrote:
>>   config LSM
>>          string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs"
>> +       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
>> +       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo,selinux,smack,apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
>> +       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
>>          default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor"
>>          help
>>            A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
>>
>> (I don't see a way to include an earlier config string in a new
>> default.) Thoughts?
>>
> Hmm, DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO no longer works because TOMOYO will be
> always enabled as long as CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO=y. Maybe
>
>   config LSM
>          string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs"
> -       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor"
> +       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX
> +       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
> +       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
> +       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> +       default "yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
>          help
>            A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
>
> (i.e. include only up to one major LSM as default choice, and allow manually including
> multiple major LSMs at both kernel build time and kernel boot time) is better?

I think this looks pretty good.