[PATCH 2/3] scripts/ima: define a set of common functions
dyoung at redhat.com
Fri Mar 8 02:44:50 UTC 2019
On 02/28/19 at 10:05am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 21:41 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi Mimi,
> > Sorry for jumping in late, just noticed this kexec selftests, I think we
> > also need a kexec load test not only for ima, but for general kexec
> The IMA kselftest tests are for the coordination between the different
> methods of verifying file signatures. In particular, for the kexec
> kernel image and kernel module signatures.
> The initial IMA kselftest just verifies that in an environment
> requiring signed kexec kernel images, the kexec_load syscall fails.
> This week I posted additional IMA kselftests, including one for
> the kexec_file_load syscall. I would really appreciate these
> kselftests being reviewed/acked.
>  Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] selftests/ima: add kexec and kernel module tests
>  Patches available from the "next-queued-testing" branch
Still did not get change to have a look at V2, but seems you missed the
last chunk of comments about the secure boot mode in previous reply?
I just copy it hear:
Do you want to get the Secureboot status here?
I got some advice from Peter Jones previously, thus we have below
in our kdump scripts:
See the function is_secure_boot_enforced(), probably you can refer to
that function and check setup mode as well.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive