[PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules
Matthew Garrett
mjg59 at google.com
Thu Mar 7 22:27:30 UTC 2019
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot())
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
> + set_module_sig_enforced();
> return sb_arch_rules;
Linus previously pushed back on having the lockdown features
automatically enabled on secure boot systems. Why are we doing the
same in IMA?
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list