[PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules

Matthew Garrett mjg59 at google.com
Thu Mar 7 22:27:30 UTC 2019


On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot())
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
> +               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
> +                       set_module_sig_enforced();
>                 return sb_arch_rules;

Linus previously pushed back on having the lockdown features
automatically enabled on secure boot systems. Why are we doing the
same in IMA?



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list