[PATCH v2 12/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid
Casey Schaufler
casey at schaufler-ca.com
Tue Jun 18 23:05:38 UTC 2019
Change the security_inode_getsecid() interface to fill in a
lsmblob structure instead of a u32 secid. This allows for its
callers to gather data from all registered LSMs. Data is provided
for IMA and audit.
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
---
include/linux/security.h | 7 ++++---
kernel/auditsc.c | 6 +++++-
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 4 +---
security/security.c | 8 ++++++--
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index c73ad27a01c0..b28d4f9c7714 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ int security_inode_killpriv(struct dentry *dentry);
int security_inode_getsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void **buffer, bool alloc);
int security_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, const void *value, size_t size, int flags);
int security_inode_listsecurity(struct inode *inode, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size);
-void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
+void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, struct lsmblob *l);
int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name);
int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask);
@@ -854,9 +854,10 @@ static inline int security_inode_listsecurity(struct inode *inode, char *buffer,
return 0;
}
-static inline void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid)
+static inline void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode,
+ struct lsmblob *l)
{
- *secid = 0;
+ lsmblob_init(l, 0);
}
static inline int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index 851947a77a16..cdd1dd9e0eec 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -1908,13 +1908,17 @@ static inline int audit_copy_fcaps(struct audit_names *name,
void audit_copy_inode(struct audit_names *name, const struct dentry *dentry,
struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags)
{
+ struct lsmblob le;
+
name->ino = inode->i_ino;
name->dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev;
name->mode = inode->i_mode;
name->uid = inode->i_uid;
name->gid = inode->i_gid;
name->rdev = inode->i_rdev;
- security_inode_getsecid(inode, &name->osid);
+ security_inode_getsecid(inode, &le);
+ /* scaffolding until osid is updated */
+ name->osid = le.secid[1];
if (flags & AUDIT_INODE_NOEVAL) {
name->fcap_ver = -1;
return;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index ae525a89e07f..6757cd6f4027 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -326,7 +326,6 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
return false;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
int rc = 0;
- u32 osid;
struct lsmblob le;
int retried = 0;
@@ -337,8 +336,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
case LSM_OBJ_USER:
case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
case LSM_OBJ_TYPE:
- security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid);
- lsmblob_init(&le, osid);
+ security_inode_getsecid(inode, &le);
rc = security_filter_rule_match(&le,
rule->lsm[i].type,
Audit_equal,
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index c92d6e04d577..e82994667263 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1418,9 +1418,13 @@ int security_inode_listsecurity(struct inode *inode, char *buffer, size_t buffer
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_listsecurity);
-void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid)
+void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, struct lsmblob *l)
{
- call_void_hook(inode_getsecid, inode, secid);
+ struct security_hook_list *hp;
+
+ lsmblob_init(l, 0);
+ hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.inode_getsecid, list)
+ hp->hook.inode_getsecid(inode, &l->secid[hp->slot]);
}
int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
--
2.20.1
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list