[PATCH 22/58] Audit: Change audit_sig_sid to audit_sig_lsm

[Casey Schaufler]

On 6/6/2019 11:41 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:23:07PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> Maybe lsm_export_is_interesting()?
>> I'd love to discover there's a convention I could adhere to.
> I'd agree "lsm_data" seems meaningless. lsm_export does seem a better
> name, though it has the "export is also a verb" issue. Would "lsm_context"
> or "lsm_ctx"?
> be better?
>
> then we get lsm_ctx_is_interesting() and lsm_ctx_to_secid() ?

Fiddling around with this led me to think "struct lsmdata"
would work, although maybe "struct lsmblob", in keeping with
the notion it is opaque. Leaving out the "_" helps with the
verb issue, I think. I think ctx or context is right out, as
secctx is the string representation, and it would really confuse
things.