[PATCH v10 1/2] mm: security: introduce init_on_alloc=1 and init_on_free=1 boot options
akpm at linux-foundation.org
Thu Jul 4 19:53:49 UTC 2019
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:40:26 +0200 Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com> wrote:
> > There are unchangelogged alterations between v9 and v10. The
> > replacement of IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING)) with
> > page_poisoning_enabled().
> In the case I send another version of the patch, do I need to
> retroactively add them to the changelog?
I don't think the world could stand another version ;)
Please simply explain this change for the reviewers?
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive