[RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/mm/fault: hook up SCI verification
luto at kernel.org
Tue Apr 30 16:44:09 UTC 2019
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:47 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:42:23AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:45:52AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > If a system call runs in isolated context, it's accesses to kernel code and
> > > data will be verified by SCI susbsytem.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > There's a distinct lack of touching do_double_fault(). It appears to me
> > that you'll instantly trigger #DF when you #PF, because the #PF handler
> > itself will not be able to run.
> The #PF handler is able to run. On interrupt/error entry the cr3 is
> switched to the full kernel page tables, pretty much like PTI does for
> user <-> kernel transitions. It's in the patch 3.
PeterZ meant page_fault, not do_page_fault. In your patch, page_fault
and some of error_entry run before that magic switchover happens. If
they're not in the page tables, you double-fault.
And don't even try to do SCI magic in the double-fault handler. As I
understand it, the SDM and APM aren't kidding when they say that #DF
is an abort, not a fault. There is a single case in the kernel where
we recover from #DF, and it was vetted by microcode people.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive