[tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: improve tpm_tis send() performance by ignoring burstcount
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com
Tue Aug 15 06:08:23 UTC 2017
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:03:05AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 13:56 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> > > > > I would like to see tpm_msleep() wrapper to replace current msleep()
> > > > > usage across the subsystem before considering this. I.e. wrapper that
> > > > > internally uses usleep_range(). This way we can mechanically convert
> > > > > everything to a more low latency option.
> > > >
> > > > Fine. I assume you meant tpm_sleep(), not tpm_msleep().
> > >
> > > I think it would sense to have a function that takes msecs because msecs
> > > are mostly used everywhere in the subsystem. This way we don't have to
> > > change any of the existing constants.
>
> For now converting from msleep() to tpm_msleep() will be straight
> forward. Internally we would just use usleep_range().
>
> Going forward, my concern is that even 1 msec might be too long for
> some of these sleeps.
>
> Mimi
We can revisit this. I would take the simple route right now.
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list