[tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: improve tpm_tis send() performance by ignoring burstcount
Mimi Zohar
zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Aug 14 12:03:05 UTC 2017
On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 13:56 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > I would like to see tpm_msleep() wrapper to replace current msleep()
> > > > usage across the subsystem before considering this. I.e. wrapper that
> > > > internally uses usleep_range(). This way we can mechanically convert
> > > > everything to a more low latency option.
> > >
> > > Fine. I assume you meant tpm_sleep(), not tpm_msleep().
> >
> > I think it would sense to have a function that takes msecs because msecs
> > are mostly used everywhere in the subsystem. This way we don't have to
> > change any of the existing constants.
For now converting from msleep() to tpm_msleep() will be straight
forward. Internally we would just use usleep_range().
Going forward, my concern is that even 1 msec might be too long for
some of these sleeps.
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list