[RFC PATCH 5/6] KEYS: Replace assoc_array with struct keyring_index
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko at kernel.org
Thu Oct 22 15:56:02 UTC 2026
On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 04:02:48PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Please don't put this in keyring_link. It's only needed by __key_link() and
> friends and could be passed around in a context struct as the edit script is
> done now:
>
> struct keyring_link_context {
> struct keyring_link *spare; /* Spare link block */
> struct keyring_link *replace; /* Link being replaced */
> };
>
> then:
>
> int __key_link_begin(struct key *keyring,
> const struct keyring_index_key *index_key,
> - struct assoc_array_edit **_edit)
> + struct keyring_link_context **_edit)
Hmm... I think it would be more transparent to pass two element array
than declare a struct here. It does not do a lot and makes the code
just require more cross-referencing.
I'm not fighting over this detail but even when I look at the patch
the struct makes it more confusing to proof-read.
Br, Jarkko
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list