[PATCH v2] security: commoncap: clarify CAP_FS_SET comment in cap_task_fix_setuid()

[Serge Hallyn (AMD)]

On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 11:52:08PM -0300, Adriano Cordova wrote:
> CAP_FS_SET is exactly the set of capabilities that an fsuid of 0
> historically granted (see CAP_FS_MASK in include/linux/capability.h),
> so cap_task_fix_setuid() drops that set from the effective set when
> fsuid leaves 0.  Replace the stale FIXME with this explanation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adriano Cordova <adrianox at gmail.com>

Hi,

so I had this in the caps-next branch, and was getting ready to send
a PR...  and was not feeling could about the new text.  It's stating
the obvious.  Do you mind sending a new version that just drops the
FIXME an ddoesn't add the new text?

> ---
> v2: reword the comment to something more concise.
> 
>  security/commoncap.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> index 3399535808fe..1ba2ea2651fc 100644
> --- a/security/commoncap.c
> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> @@ -1169,11 +1169,13 @@ int cap_task_fix_setuid(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old, int flags)
>  		break;
>  
>  	case LSM_SETID_FS:
> -		/* juggle the capabilities to follow FSUID changes, unless
> -		 * otherwise suppressed
> +		/* Juggle the capabilities to follow FSUID changes, unless
> +		 * otherwise suppressed.
>  		 *
> -		 * FIXME - is fsuser used for all CAP_FS_MASK capabilities?
> -		 *          if not, we might be a bit too harsh here.
> +		 * CAP_FS_SET is exactly the set of capabilities that an
> +		 * fsuid of 0 historically granted (see CAP_FS_MASK in
> +		 * <linux/capability.h>), so we drop that set when fsuid
> +		 * leaves 0.
>  		 */
>  		if (!issecure(SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP)) {
>  			kuid_t root_uid = make_kuid(old->user_ns, 0);
> -- 
> 2.51.0
>