[PATCH v6 1/8] landlock: Rename quiet_masks to quiet_access

Günther Noack gnoack3000 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 17 10:20:45 UTC 2026


On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 10:27:07AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> The base stores the fs/net/scope quiet bitmasks in a struct access_masks
> field named quiet_masks.  A following commit adds the sibling struct
> permission_masks field quiet_permission for capabilities and namespaces.
> quiet_masks drops the access category and keeps the type half ("masks"),
> while quiet_permission keeps the category and drops the type half, so
> the two read as an inconsistent pair.
> 
> Rename the base field to quiet_access, giving the symmetric,
> category-named pair quiet_access/quiet_permission that also matches the
> UAPI handled_access_*/quiet_access_* naming.  This is a
> no-functional-change rename.
> 
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack at google.com>
> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m at maowtm.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tingmao Wang <m at maowtm.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic at digikod.net>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v3:
> https://patch.msgid.link/20260726161400.3010511-5-mic@digikod.net
> - Adapt the rename to the split ruleset/domain and logging code.
> - Add Reviewed-by: Tingmao Wang.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> - New patch.
> ---
>  security/landlock/domain.c   |  2 +-
>  security/landlock/domain.h   |  4 ++--
>  security/landlock/log.c      |  6 +++---
>  security/landlock/ruleset.h  |  4 ++--
>  security/landlock/syscalls.c | 10 +++++-----
>  5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/landlock/domain.c b/security/landlock/domain.c
> index 4031b581be07..c66663f8cd8b 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/domain.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/domain.c
> @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ landlock_merge_ruleset(struct landlock_domain *const parent,
>  		return ERR_PTR(err);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG
> -	new_dom->hierarchy->quiet_masks = ruleset->quiet_masks;
> +	new_dom->hierarchy->quiet_access = ruleset->quiet_access;
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG */
>  
>  	return no_free_ptr(new_dom);
> diff --git a/security/landlock/domain.h b/security/landlock/domain.h
> index 428c1d9890db..61d89261e280 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/domain.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/domain.h
> @@ -130,10 +130,10 @@ struct landlock_hierarchy {
>  		 */
>  		log_new_exec : 1;
>  	/**
> -	 * @quiet_masks: Bitmasks of access that should be quieted (i.e. not
> +	 * @quiet_access: Bitmasks of access that should be quieted (i.e. not
>  	 * logged) if the related object is marked as quiet.
>  	 */
> -	struct access_masks quiet_masks;
> +	struct access_masks quiet_access;
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG */
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/security/landlock/log.c b/security/landlock/log.c
> index a8578a6f2ce9..3f9ae1bacb23 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/log.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/log.c
> @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ is_denial_quieted(const struct landlock_request *const request,
>  	if (object_quiet_flag) {
>  		const access_mask_t quiet_mask =
>  			pick_access_mask_for_request_type(
> -				request->type, youngest_denied->quiet_masks);
> +				request->type, youngest_denied->quiet_access);
>  
>  		return (quiet_mask & missing) == missing;
>  	}
> @@ -447,10 +447,10 @@ is_denial_quieted(const struct landlock_request *const request,
>  	 */
>  	switch (request->type) {
>  	case LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_SIGNAL:
> -		return !!(youngest_denied->quiet_masks.scope &
> +		return !!(youngest_denied->quiet_access.scope &
>  			  LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL);
>  	case LANDLOCK_REQUEST_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET:
> -		return !!(youngest_denied->quiet_masks.scope &
> +		return !!(youngest_denied->quiet_access.scope &
>  			  LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET);
>  	/*
>  	 * Leave LANDLOCK_REQUEST_PTRACE and LANDLOCK_REQUEST_FS_CHANGE_TOPOLOGY
> diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> index cf77f1806a95..8ebdd4fa098f 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> @@ -182,11 +182,11 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
>  #endif /* CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS */
>  
>  	/**
> -	 * @quiet_masks: Stores the quiet flags for an unmerged ruleset.  For a
> +	 * @quiet_access: Stores the quiet flags for an unmerged ruleset.  For a
>  	 * merged domain, this is stored in each layer's struct
>  	 * landlock_hierarchy instead.
>  	 */
> -	struct access_masks quiet_masks;
> +	struct access_masks quiet_access;
>  	/**
>  	 * @handled_masks: Contains the subset of filesystem and network actions
>  	 * that are handled by this ruleset.
> diff --git a/security/landlock/syscalls.c b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
> index 1d02d57f4c48..17d8e9b7b0c6 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/syscalls.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
> @@ -280,9 +280,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(landlock_create_ruleset,
>  	if (IS_ERR(ruleset))
>  		return PTR_ERR(ruleset);
>  
> -	ruleset->quiet_masks.fs = ruleset_attr.quiet_access_fs;
> -	ruleset->quiet_masks.net = ruleset_attr.quiet_access_net;
> -	ruleset->quiet_masks.scope = ruleset_attr.quiet_scoped;
> +	ruleset->quiet_access.fs = ruleset_attr.quiet_access_fs;
> +	ruleset->quiet_access.net = ruleset_attr.quiet_access_net;
> +	ruleset->quiet_access.scope = ruleset_attr.quiet_scoped;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Emits before anon_inode_getfd() installs the file descriptor, while
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int add_rule_path_beneath(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/* Checks for useless quiet flag. */
> -	if (flags & LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET && !ruleset->quiet_masks.fs)
> +	if (flags & LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET && !ruleset->quiet_access.fs)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/* Gets and checks the new rule. */
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int add_rule_net_port(struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/* Checks for useless quiet flag. */
> -	if (flags & LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET && !ruleset->quiet_masks.net)
> +	if (flags & LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET && !ruleset->quiet_access.net)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/* Denies inserting a rule with port greater than 65535. */
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000 at gmail.com>



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list