[PATCH v2 -next 10/18] LSM: rename inode_getattr to path_getattr

[sashiko-bot at kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] selftests/bpf: use of deprecated CHECK() macro in updated test code
--

commit c4d97789c19b5bd634c796fba77ad30dd5acd56f
Author: Cai Xinchen <caixinchen1 at huawei.com>

LSM: rename inode_getattr to path_getattr

This commit renames the inode_getattr hook to path_getattr to follow the
path_* naming convention used for other hooks taking a struct path. It also
updates the security_* wrappers and adjusts BPF selftests to use the new
names.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
> index 1a2a2f1abf033..9877c098e5c14 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void test_d_path_basic(void)
>  
>  	if (CHECK(!bss->called_stat,
>  		  "stat",
> -		  "trampoline for security_inode_getattr was not called\n"))
> +		  "trampoline for security_path_getattr was not called\n"))

[Severity: Low]
The BPF subsystem guidelines prefer replacing the deprecated CHECK macros with
modern ASSERT_* macros (such as ASSERT_TRUE or ASSERT_EQ) when writing new
tests or updating existing ones.

Since this patch updates the string literal inside the CHECK macro call in
test_d_path_basic(), could this be migrated to the modern assertion standard?

>  		goto cleanup;
>  
>  	if (CHECK(!bss->called_close,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015125425.3246251-1-caixinchen1@huawei.com?part=10