[PATCH] landlock: Drop __counted_by from landlock_domain.layers

[Günther Noack]

On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 11:44:49PM +0700, Nguyen Ngoc Thang wrote:
> With clang 22 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, the second
> landlock_restrict_self() call hits a bogus fortify report in
> inherit_ruleset():
> 
>   memcpy: detected buffer overflow: 16 byte read of buffer size 0
>   Call Trace:
>    __fortify_panic
>    landlock_merge_ruleset+0xc46/0xc90
>    __se_sys_landlock_restrict_self+0x2bc/0xd40
> 
> layers[] lives in an anonymous struct inside the anonymous union
> that overlays work_free.  For such a flexible array, clang computes the
> address of the __counted_by counter as the start of the array instead of
> &num_layers.  The bound is then read from layers[0], i.e. from
> the first layer's configuration, which is not a count.  The same layout
> crashes clang itself in a standalone test.
> 
> The annotation was added as documentation, so drop it rather than
> restructure the union.  Keep the information in the member comment.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+a0eecb22de4d821a9e5d at syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a0eecb22de4d821a9e5d
> Fixes: bd3a19800dd1 ("landlock: Add counted_by in landlock_domain")
> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999 at gmail.com>
> ---
> Reproduced with clang 22.1.8 and FORTIFY_SOURCE on mic/next (64b9e6eff524):
> the second landlock_restrict_self() hits the report, while 16 nested
> restricts run clean with this patch.  Mickaël, if you prefer to just drop
> bd3a19800dd1 from next, that works as well.
>  security/landlock/domain.h | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/landlock/domain.h b/security/landlock/domain.h
> index 60e8eb2d6ac2..4bf1555a4349 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/domain.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/domain.h
> @@ -246,8 +246,12 @@ struct landlock_domain {
>  			 * properly handle merged rulesets without overlapping
>  			 * access rights.  These layers are set once and never
>  			 * changed for the lifetime of the domain.
> +			 *
> +			 * Not annotated with __counted_by(@num_layers): clang
> +			 * miscomputes the counter address for a FAM nested in an
> +			 * anonymous struct within a union, which trips FORTIFY.
>  			 */
> -			struct layer_config layers[] __counted_by(num_layers);
> +			struct layer_config layers[];
>  		};
>  	};
>  };
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000 at gmail.com>

I agree - it seems better to drop the __counted_by rather than
restructuring the entire struct for that.

Thanks also for adding a comment about it.  The __counted_by() has
only been added very recently in September, in commit bd3a19800dd1
("landlock: Add counted_by in landlock_domain").  Better to have a
note about it so that we don't accidentally add it back. :)

–Günther