[PATCH 16/18] LSM: Allow arbitrary LSM ordering

Kees Cook keescook at chromium.org
Mon Sep 17 23:20:26 UTC 2018


On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Mickaël Salaün <mic at digikod.net> wrote:
> Landlock, because it target unprivileged users, should only be called
> after all other major (access-control) LSMs. The admin or distro must
> not be able to change that order in any way. This constraint doesn't
> apply to current LSMs, though.

Good point! It will be easy to add LSM_ORDER_LAST, though, given the
machinery introduced in this series.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list