[PATCH v8 03/12] landlock: Replace union access_masks_all with helper functions
Mickaël Salaün
mic at digikod.net
Mon Mar 30 10:53:21 UTC 2026
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 11:56:40AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 05:48:28PM +0100, Günther Noack wrote:
> > * Stop using a union for access_masks_all.
> > * Expose helper functions for intersection checks and union operations.
> >
> > The memory layout of bitfields is only loosely defined by the C
> > standard, so our static assertion that expects a fixed size was
> > brittle, and it broke on some compilers when we attempted to add a
> > 17th file system access right.
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603261438.jBx2DGNe-lkp@intel.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > security/landlock/access.h | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> > security/landlock/cred.h | 10 ++--------
> > security/landlock/ruleset.h | 13 ++++---------
> > 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> I'd prefer this approach:
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/access.h b/security/landlock/access.h
> index 89dc8e7b93da..bc9efbb5c900 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/access.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/access.h
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct access_masks {
> access_mask_t fs : LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS;
> access_mask_t net : LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET;
> access_mask_t scope : LANDLOCK_NUM_SCOPE;
> -};
> +} __packed;
Actually, we can just use '__packed __aligned(sizeof(u32))' and avoid
the static_assert change. That would have no impact on x86, but pack it
on m68k.
>
> union access_masks_all {
> struct access_masks masks;
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ union access_masks_all {
> };
>
> /* Makes sure all fields are covered. */
> -static_assert(sizeof(typeof_member(union access_masks_all, masks)) ==
> +static_assert(sizeof(typeof_member(union access_masks_all, masks)) <=
> sizeof(typeof_member(union access_masks_all, all)));
>
> /**
>
>
> This keep the check and make sure new field will not introduce issues, but more
> importantly it save memory, which was one of the goal of struct access_masks.
>
> If that's good with you I'll replace your patch and squash this packed
> annotation with the following patch.
>
>
> >
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/access.h b/security/landlock/access.h
> > index 42c95747d7bd..277b6ed7f7bb 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/access.h
> > +++ b/security/landlock/access.h
> > @@ -52,14 +52,21 @@ struct access_masks {
> > access_mask_t scope : LANDLOCK_NUM_SCOPE;
> > };
> >
> > -union access_masks_all {
> > - struct access_masks masks;
> > - u32 all;
> > -};
> > +/* Checks whether two access masks have any common bit set. */
> > +static inline bool access_masks_intersect(const struct access_masks a,
> > + const struct access_masks b)
> > +{
> > + return (a.fs & b.fs) || (a.net & b.net) || (a.scope & b.scope);
> > +}
> >
> > -/* Makes sure all fields are covered. */
> > -static_assert(sizeof(typeof_member(union access_masks_all, masks)) ==
> > - sizeof(typeof_member(union access_masks_all, all)));
> > +/* ORs the bits of @src into @dst. */
> > +static inline void access_masks_merge(struct access_masks *dst,
> > + const struct access_masks src)
> > +{
> > + dst->fs |= src.fs;
> > + dst->net |= src.net;
> > + dst->scope |= src.scope;
> > +}
> >
> > /**
> > * struct layer_access_masks - A boolean matrix of layers and access rights
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/cred.h b/security/landlock/cred.h
> > index f287c56b5fd4..207a6db1c086 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/cred.h
> > +++ b/security/landlock/cred.h
> > @@ -123,9 +123,6 @@ landlock_get_applicable_subject(const struct cred *const cred,
> > const struct access_masks masks,
> > size_t *const handle_layer)
> > {
> > - const union access_masks_all masks_all = {
> > - .masks = masks,
> > - };
> > const struct landlock_ruleset *domain;
> > ssize_t layer_level;
> >
> > @@ -138,11 +135,8 @@ landlock_get_applicable_subject(const struct cred *const cred,
> >
> > for (layer_level = domain->num_layers - 1; layer_level >= 0;
> > layer_level--) {
> > - union access_masks_all layer = {
> > - .masks = domain->access_masks[layer_level],
> > - };
> > -
> > - if (layer.all & masks_all.all) {
> > + if (access_masks_intersect(domain->access_masks[layer_level],
> > + masks)) {
> > if (handle_layer)
> > *handle_layer = layer_level;
> >
> > diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> > index 889f4b30301a..9f8b33815c2c 100644
> > --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> > +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> > @@ -229,18 +229,13 @@ static inline void landlock_get_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset)
> > static inline struct access_masks
> > landlock_union_access_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain)
> > {
> > - union access_masks_all matches = {};
> > + struct access_masks matches = {};
> > size_t layer_level;
> >
> > - for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++) {
> > - union access_masks_all layer = {
> > - .masks = domain->access_masks[layer_level],
> > - };
> > + for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++)
> > + access_masks_merge(&matches, domain->access_masks[layer_level]);
> >
> > - matches.all |= layer.all;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return matches.masks;
> > + return matches;
> > }
> >
> > static inline void
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> >
> >
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list