[RFC PATCH v1 02/11] security: Add LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NS for namespace audit records

Christian Brauner brauner at kernel.org
Wed Mar 25 12:32:42 UTC 2026


On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:04:35AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Add a new LSM audit data type LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NS that logs namespace
> information in audit records.  Two fields are provided, matching the
> field names of struct ns_common:
> 
> - ns_type: the CLONE_NEW* flag identifying the namespace type, logged in
>   hexadecimal.
> 
> - inum: the proc inode number identifying a specific namespace instance.
>   Namespace inode numbers are allocated by proc_alloc_inum() via
>   ida_alloc_max() bounded to UINT_MAX, so the value always fits in 32
>   bits.
> 
> A new audit data type is needed because no existing LSM_AUDIT_DATA_*
> type carries namespace information.  The closest alternatives (e.g.
> LSM_AUDIT_DATA_TASK or LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NONE with custom strings) would
> either lose the namespace type or require ad-hoc formatting that
> bypasses the structured audit data union.
> 
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner at kernel.org>
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack at google.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic at digikod.net>
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_audit.h | 5 +++++
>  security/lsm_audit.c      | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_audit.h b/include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> index 382c56a97bba..6e20a56b8c22 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct common_audit_data {
>  #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NOTIFICATION 16
>  #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_ANONINODE	17
>  #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NLMSGTYPE	18
> +#define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NS		19
>  	union 	{
>  		struct path path;
>  		struct dentry *dentry;
> @@ -100,6 +101,10 @@ struct common_audit_data {
>  		int reason;
>  		const char *anonclass;
>  		u16 nlmsg_type;
> +		struct {
> +			u32 ns_type;
> +			unsigned int inum;

fwiw, you might want to start the 64-bit namespace id as well.
But either way:

Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner at kernel.org>



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list