[PATCH] landlock: add missing task != NULL check in cancel_tsync_works()

[Mickaël Salaün]

Thanks. This issue was fixed in -next with
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260217122341.2359582-1-mic@digikod.net/

I'll send a PR next week.

On Sat, Mar 07, 2026 at 02:21:32PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> syzbot is reporting NULL pointer dereference at cancel_tsync_works(), for
> tsync_works_release() checks for works->works[i]->task != NULL but
> cancel_tsync_works() does not.
> 
> works->works[i]->task becomes NULL when tsync_works_provide() incremented
> works->size and then task_work_add() returned an error. Therefore,
> cancel_tsync_works() needs to check for works->works[i]->task != NULL.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+741e2278ef71fef03a10 at syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=741e2278ef71fef03a10
> Fixes: 42fc7e6543f6 ("landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self()")
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel at I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> ---
>  security/landlock/tsync.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/security/landlock/tsync.c b/security/landlock/tsync.c
> index de01aa899751..8925acbef8a5 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/tsync.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/tsync.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,8 @@ static void cancel_tsync_works(struct tsync_works *works,
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < works->size; i++) {
> +		if (!works->works[i]->task)
> +			continue;
>  		if (!task_work_cancel(works->works[i]->task,
>  				      &works->works[i]->work))
>  			continue;
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 
>