[PATCH] xfrm: force flush upon NETDEV_UNREGISTER event
Sabrina Dubroca
sd at queasysnail.net
Mon Jan 26 14:16:34 UTC 2026
2026-01-22, 22:07:46 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2026/01/22 20:32, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 08:28:31PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >> On 2026/01/22 20:15, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >>> Hm, I'd say we should not try to offload to a device that does
> >>> not support NETIF_F_HW_ESP.
> >>
> >> I was about to post the patch below, but you are suggesting that "do not allow calling
> >> xfrm_dev_state_add()/xfrm_dev_policy_add() if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) == 0" ?
> >
> > As said, I think this is the correct way to do it. But let's wait
> > on opinions from the hardware people.
But the current behavior ("ignore NETIF_F_HW_ESP and call
xdo_dev_state_add for new states anyway") has been established for
multiple years. Changing that now seems a bit risky.
> OK. I guess something like below.
>
> net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> index 52ae0e034d29..19aa61609d24 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,13 @@ int xfrm_dev_state_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_state *x,
> dst_release(dst);
> }
>
> + if (!(dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device doesn't support offload");
> + xso->dev = NULL;
> + dev_put(dev);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
I'm not sure we want to make state creation fail in this case...
> +
> if (!dev->xfrmdev_ops || !dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add) {
while it will succeed (just without offload) in that case.
> xso->dev = NULL;
> dev_put(dev);
> @@ -367,7 +374,8 @@ int xfrm_dev_policy_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_policy *xp,
> if (!dev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (!dev->xfrmdev_ops || !dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_policy_add) {
> + if (!dev->xfrmdev_ops || !dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_policy_add ||
> + !(dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)) {
> xdo->dev = NULL;
> dev_put(dev);
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Policy offload is not supported");
--
Sabrina
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list