[PATCH v7 0/9] Implement LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET
Tingmao Wang
m at maowtm.org
Mon Jan 19 22:05:13 UTC 2026
On 1/19/26 14:26, Justin Suess wrote:
> [...]
> Hey Tingmao,
>
> Thank you for your work on this patch-- I don’t have any further nits,
> this looks very clean.
>
> Do you plan to rebase/resend this series on the current mic-next branch
> at some point? It would be helpful to be able to test it alongside some
> of the other Landlock series that are in flight.>
> Feedback on the latest version of the series has been fairly quiet so far,
> and having it rebased would make cross-testing easier. I’d also rebase the
> LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_NO_INHERIT series on top for further consideration.
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the reminder :)
I don't have any changes waiting for v8, and all the patches except one
already applies cleanly, and the one that conflicted was due to a fixed
typo, in patch 6, which git can also sort out automatically with git am
--3way:
$ b4 am '<cover.1766330134.git.m at maowtm.org>'
(ignore to suggestion to checkout the base commit - this can be
applied onto mic/next cleanly)
$ git am --3way ./v7_20251221_m_implement_landlock_add_rule_quiet.mbx
I should probably still resend at some point anyway just to make it easier
for everybody - but given this is lower priority (rightfully) than the
socket stuff, and review is not blocked anyway, I guess I will wait a bit
before spamming :D
Kind regards,
Tingmao
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list