[PATCH] man/man7/kernel_lockdown.7: remove Secure Boot untruth

Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk at gmx.de
Tue Feb 3 20:47:57 UTC 2026


Am 3. Februar 2026 21:27:44 MEZ schrieb Alejandro Colomar <alx at kernel.org>:
>Hi Alyssa,
>
>On 2026-02-03T20:53:33+0100, Alyssa Ross wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 08:50:01PM +0100, Alyssa Ross wrote:
>> > This is true for Fedora, where this page was sourced from, but I don't
>> > believe it has ever been true for the mainline kernel, because Linus
>> > rejected it.
>> >
>> > Link: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2088704#p2088704
>> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFzYbpRAdma0PvqE+9ygySuKzNKByqOzzMufBoovXVnfPw@mail.gmail.com/
>> > Fixes: bb509e6fc ("kernel_lockdown.7: New page documenting the Kernel Lockdown feature")
>
>I've now CCed you in an email documenting the format we use for these.
>It should be:
>
>Fixes: bb509e6fcbae (2020-10-16; "kernel_lockdown.7: New page documenting the Kernel Lockdown feature")
>
>I'll amend that myself.
>
>> > Signed-off-by: Alyssa Ross <hi at alyssa.is>
>> 
>> Just noticed there's a long-open bug for this as well, so additionally:
>> 
>> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213577
>
>Thanks!  I'll keep the patch for a few days, in case anyone wants to
>comment.
>
>
>Have a lovely night!
>Alex
>

Can we move the information from the Notes section to replace the removed statement? What causes lockdown is central for users.

Best regards

Heinrich




More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list