[PATCH v4 00/17] module: Introduce hash-based integrity checking
David Howells
dhowells at redhat.com
Tue Feb 3 08:22:52 UTC 2026
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley at HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
> > There is another issue too: If you have a static private key that you
> > use to sign modules (and probably other things), someone will likely
> > give you a GPL request to get it.
>
> The SFC just lost that exact point in the Vizio trial, so I think
> you're wrong on this under US law at least. There's no general ability
> under GPLv2 to demand long lived signing keys.
Cool :-). I just know that I've been sent GPL requests for kernel keys.
David
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list