[PATCH v5 13/13] doc: security: Add documentation of the IMA staging mechanism
Roberto Sassu
roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com
Wed Apr 29 16:03:19 UTC 2026
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
Add the documentation of the IMA staging mechanism in
Documentation/security/IMA-staging.rst.
Also add the missing Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst file in
MAINTAINERS.
Link: https://github.com/linux-integrity/linux/issues/1
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
---
Documentation/security/IMA-staging.rst | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/security/index.rst | 1 +
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/security/IMA-staging.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/security/IMA-staging.rst b/Documentation/security/IMA-staging.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..de6428893f0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/security/IMA-staging.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==================================
+IMA Measurements Staging Mechanism
+==================================
+
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+The IMA measurements list is currently stored in the kernel memory. Memory
+occupation grows linearly with the number of entries, and can become a
+problem especially in environments with reduced resources.
+
+While there is an advantage in keeping the IMA measurements list in kernel
+memory, so that it is always available for reading from the securityfs
+interfaces, storing it elsewhere would make it possible to free precious
+memory for other kernel components.
+
+Storing the IMA measurements list outside the kernel does not introduce
+security issues, since its integrity is anyway protected by the TPM.
+
+Hence, the new IMA staging mechanism is introduced to allow user space
+to remove the desired portion of the measurements list from the kernel.
+
+
+Usage
+=====
+
+The IMA staging mechanism can be enabled from the kernel configuration with
+the CONFIG_IMA_STAGING option.
+
+If it is enabled, IMA duplicates the current measurements interfaces (both
+binary and ASCII), by adding the ``_staged`` file suffix. Both the original
+and the staging interfaces gain the write permission for the root user and
+group, but require the process to have CAP_SYS_ADMIN set.
+
+The staging mechanism supports two flavors.
+
+
+Staging with prompt
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The current measurements list is moved to a temporary staging area, and
+staged measurements are deleted upon confirmation.
+
+This staging process is achieved with the following steps.
+
+ 1. ``echo A > <original interface>``: the user requests IMA to stage the
+ entire measurements list;
+ 2. ``cat <_staged interface>``: the user reads the staged measurements;
+ 3. ``echo D > <_staged interface>``: the user requests IMA to delete
+ staged measurements.
+
+
+Staging and deleting
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+N measurements are staged to a temporary staging area, and immediately
+deleted without further confirmation.
+
+This staging process is achieved with the following steps.
+
+ 1. ``cat <original interface>``: the user reads the current measurements
+ list and determines what the value N for staging should be;
+ 2. ``echo N > <original interface>``: the user requests IMA to delete N
+ measurements from the current measurements list.
+
+
+Interface Access
+================
+
+In order to avoid the IMA measurements list be suddenly truncated by the
+staging mechanism during a read, or having multiple concurrent staging, a
+semaphore-like locking scheme has been implemented on all the measurements
+list interfaces.
+
+Multiple readers can access concurrently the original and staged
+interfaces, and they can be in mutual exclusion with one writer.
+
+If an illegal access occurs, the open to the measurements list interface is
+denied.
+
+
+Management of Staged Measurements
+=================================
+
+Since with the staging mechanism measurement entries are removed from the
+kernel, the user needs to save the staged ones in a storage and concatenate
+them together, so that it can present them to remote attestation agents as
+if staging was never done.
+
+Coordination is necessary in the case where there are multiple actors
+requesting measurements to be staged.
+
+In the staging with prompt case, the measurement interfaces can be accessed
+only by one actor (writer) at a time, so the others will get an error until
+the former closes it. Since the actors don't care about N, when they gain
+access to the interface, they will get all the staged measurements at the
+time of their request.
+
+In the case of staging and deleting, coordination is more important, since
+there is the risk that two actors unaware of each other compute the value N
+on the current measurements list and request IMA to stage N twice.
+
+
+Remote Attestation Agent Workflow
+=================================
+
+Users can choose the staging method they find more appropriate for their
+workflow.
+
+If, as an example, a remote attestation agent would like to present to the
+remote attestation server only the measurements that are required to
+verify the TPM quote, its workflow would be the following.
+
+With staging with prompt, the agent stages the current measurements list,
+reads and stores the measurements in a storage and immediately requests
+IMA to delete the staged measurements from kernel memory. Afterwards, it
+calculates N by replaying the PCR extend on the stored measurements until
+the calculated PCRs match the quoted PCRs. It then keeps the measurements
+in excess for the next attestation request.
+
+At the next attestation request, the agent performs the same steps above,
+and concatenates the new measurements to the ones in excess from the
+previous request. Also in this case, the agent replays the PCR extend until
+it matches the currently quoted PCRs, keeps the measurements in excess and
+presents the new N measurements entries to the remote attestation server.
+
+With the staging and deleting method, the agent reads the current
+measurements list, calculates N and requests IMA to delete only those. The
+measurements in excess are kept in the IMA measurements list and can be
+retrieved at the next remote attestation request.
+
+Kexec
+=====
+
+In the event a kexec() system call occurs between staging and deleting, the
+staged measurements entries are prepended to the current measurements list,
+so that they are both available when the secondary kernel starts. In that
+case, IMA returns an error to the user when attempting to delete staged
+measurements to notify about their copy to the kexec buffer, so that the
+user does not store them twice.
+
+
+Hash table
+==========
+
+By default, the template digest of staged measurement entries are kept in
+kernel memory (only template data are freed), to be able to detect
+duplicate entries independently of staging.
+
+The new kernel option ``ima_flush_htable`` has been introduced to
+explicitly request a complete deletion of the staged measurements, for
+maximum kernel memory saving. If the option has been specified, duplicate
+entries are still avoided on entries of the current measurements list,
+but there can be duplicates between different groups of staged
+measurements.
+
+Flushing the hash table is supported only for the staging with prompt
+flavor. For the staging and deleting flavor, it would have been necessary
+to lock the hot path adding new measurements for the time needed to remove
+each selected measurement individually.
diff --git a/Documentation/security/index.rst b/Documentation/security/index.rst
index 3e0a7114a862..cec064dc1c83 100644
--- a/Documentation/security/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/security/index.rst
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Security Documentation
credentials
snp-tdx-threat-model
IMA-templates
+ IMA-staging
keys/index
lsm
lsm-development
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 2fb1c75afd16..5bc816ab4a5b 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -12740,6 +12740,8 @@ R: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg at oracle.com>
L: linux-integrity at vger.kernel.org
S: Supported
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git
+F: Documentation/security/IMA-staging.rst
+F: Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst
F: include/linux/secure_boot.h
F: security/integrity/
F: security/integrity/ima/
--
2.43.0
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list