[PATCH 1/4] tpm: Use -EPERM as fallback error code in tpm_ret_to_err

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 09:32:33AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 07:43:14PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at opinsys.com>
> > 
> > Using -EFAULT here was not the best idea for tpm_ret_to_err as the fallback
> > error code as it is no concise with trusted keys.
> > 
> > Change the fallback as -EPERM, process TPM_RC_HASH also in tpm_ret_to_err,
> > and by these changes make the helper applicable for trusted keys.
> > 
> > Fixes: 539fbab37881 ("tpm: Mask TPM RC in tpm2_start_auth_session()")
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at opinsys.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/tpm.h                       |  9 +++++---
> > security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 26 ++++++-----------------
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
> > index dc0338a783f3..667d290789ca 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tpm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
> > @@ -449,13 +449,16 @@ static inline ssize_t tpm_ret_to_err(ssize_t ret)
> > 	if (ret < 0)
> > 		return ret;
> > 
> > -	switch (tpm2_rc_value(ret)) {
> > -	case TPM2_RC_SUCCESS:
> > +	if (!ret)
> > 		return 0;
> 
> Fold this into the check above to get:
> 
> 	if (ret <= 0)
> 
> ?

This is really a glitch in this patch, and I think following what
Stefano suggested is the right call:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/tnxfamnvxoanaihka3em7ktmzkervoea43zn2l3mqxvnuivb6n@p5nn34vns3zf/

I.e., a random change to something that was not broken in the first
place :-) Never a good idea (not even in microscale), except something
super cosmetic like maybe grouping constants and stylistic stuff like
that.

BR, Jarkko