[PATCH v3 29/34] apparmor: move initcalls to the LSM framework
Paul Moore
paul at paul-moore.com
Mon Sep 8 21:12:29 UTC 2025
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:12 AM John Johansen
<john.johansen at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 8/14/25 15:50, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees at kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
>
> Sorry this took so long.
> So the patch itself looks good, and can have my
> Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com>
No worries, thanks.
> with that said I have done 3 different builds with this series. Tweaking the base,
> and the config, and I haven't been able to successfully booted any of them. I am
> not sure what I am missing yet. I working on a bisect, but its just a side project
> atm.
>
> Until I can get a successful boot, and test. I am going to refrain from finishing
> out the review.
It obviously built, booted, and worked for me, but as I mentioned in
the other mail to Mimi, that was some weeks ago so it's possible that
there is an issue with this patchset and one of the latest tagged
-rc's from Linus. Once the IMA/EVM patch is sorted out, which I
expect to happen in a day or two, I'll go ahead and do another post of
the patchset (complete with the usual testing beforehand) and when I
do I'll make a full tree available in the cover letter for people to
review/test/etc. in a known working context.
--
paul-moore.com
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list