[PATCH v2 3/6] landlock/audit: Check for quiet flag in landlock_log_denial

Mickaël Salaün mic at digikod.net
Mon Oct 20 20:12:27 UTC 2025


On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 06:39:55PM +0100, Tingmao Wang wrote:
> On 10/15/25 20:09, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > Just use "landlock: " as subject prefix.
> 
> What about samples/landlock or selftests/landlock (in the next version)?
> Should they also just be landlock: ?

No, those are good.  The idea is that these three prefixes identify
Landlock-related code (and potential different/complementary
maintainers) in different places.  It's not useful to identify part of
Landlock inside one file hierarchy.  In doubt, just follow the same
pattern as in previous commits:

- samples/landlock: Files in samples/landlock/

- selftests/landlock: Files in tools/testing/selftests/landlock/

- landlock: Files in security/landlock/, Documentation/*/landlock.rst,
            and Landlock catchall.



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list