[PATCH v2 3/6] landlock/audit: Check for quiet flag in landlock_log_denial
Mickaël Salaün
mic at digikod.net
Mon Oct 20 20:12:27 UTC 2025
On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 06:39:55PM +0100, Tingmao Wang wrote:
> On 10/15/25 20:09, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > Just use "landlock: " as subject prefix.
>
> What about samples/landlock or selftests/landlock (in the next version)?
> Should they also just be landlock: ?
No, those are good. The idea is that these three prefixes identify
Landlock-related code (and potential different/complementary
maintainers) in different places. It's not useful to identify part of
Landlock inside one file hierarchy. In doubt, just follow the same
pattern as in previous commits:
- samples/landlock: Files in samples/landlock/
- selftests/landlock: Files in tools/testing/selftests/landlock/
- landlock: Files in security/landlock/, Documentation/*/landlock.rst,
and Landlock catchall.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list