[PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] namei: Introduce new helper function path_walk_parent()

Tingmao Wang m at maowtm.org
Wed Jun 11 00:23:49 UTC 2025


On 6/11/25 00:08, Song Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:26 PM Tingmao Wang <m at maowtm.org> wrote:
> [..]
>>>
>>>                 if (!choose_mountpoint(real_mount(path->mnt), root, &p))
>>>                         return false;
>>>                 path_put(path);
>>>                 *path = p;
>>>                 ret = true;
>>>         }
>>>
>>>         if (unlikely(IS_ROOT(path->dentry)))
>>>                 return ret;
>>
>> Returning true here would be the wrong semantic right?  This whole thing
>> is only possible when some mount shadows "/".  Say if you have a landlock
>> rule on the old "/", but then we mount a new "/" and chroot into it (via
>> "/.."), the landlock rule on the old "/" should not apply, but if we
>> change *path and return true here then this will "expose" that old "/" to
>> landlock.
> 
> Could you please provide more specific information about this case?

Apologies, it looks like I was mistaken in the above statement.

I was thinking of something like

# mount --mkdir -t tmpfs none tmproot
# cp busybox tmproot/ && chmod +x tmproot/busybox
# mount --move tmproot /
# env LL_FS_RW=/ LL_FS_RO=/.. ./sandboxer chroot /.. /busybox sh
  # echo can write to root > /a
  sh: can't create /a: Permission denied
  ^^^^ this does not work, but I was mistakenly thinking it would

I think because choose_mountpoint_rcu only returns true if
    if (mountpoint != m->mnt.mnt_root)
passes, this situation won't cause ret to be true in your code.

But then I can't think of when
      if (unlikely(IS_ROOT(path->dentry)))
          return ret;
would ever return true, unless somehow d_parent is corrupted?  Maybe I'm
just missing something obvious here.

Anyway, since there's a suggestion from Neil to refactor this, this might
not be too important, so feel free to ignore for now.

> 
> Thanks,
> Song
> 
>> A quick suggestion although I haven't tested anything - maybe we should do
>> a special case check for IS_ROOT inside the
>>     if (unlikely(path->dentry == path->mnt->mnt_root))
>> ? Before "path_put(path);", if IS_ROOT(p.dentry) then we just path_get(p)
>> and return false.
>>
>>>
>>>         parent = dget_parent(path->dentry);
>>>         dput(path->dentry);
>>>         path->dentry = parent;
>>>         return true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Song
>>




More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list