[PATCH 1/2] fs: Provide function that allocates a secure anonymous inode
Paul Moore
paul at paul-moore.com
Thu Jun 5 18:23:20 UTC 2025
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 1:50 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> secretmem always had S_PRIVATE set because alloc_anon_inode() clears it
> anyway and this patch does not change it.
Yes, my apologies, I didn't look closely enough at the code.
> I'm just thinking that it makes sense to actually allow LSM/SELinux
> controls that S_PRIVATE bypasses for both secretmem and guest_memfd.
It's been a while since we added the anon_inode hooks so I'd have to
go dig through the old thread to understand the logic behind marking
secretmem S_PRIVATE, especially when the
anon_inode_make_secure_inode() function cleared it. It's entirely
possible it may have just been an oversight.
--
paul-moore.com
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list