[RFC PATCH v2 30/34] lockdown: move initcalls to the LSM framework
Paul Moore
paul at paul-moore.com
Fri Jul 25 16:51:00 UTC 2025
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:12 AM Xiu Jianfeng
<xiujianfeng at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> On 2025/7/22 7:21, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees at kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng at huawei.com>
Thank you for reviewing this patch. As you are a Lockdown maintainer,
can I change your reviewed-by into an acked-by tag?
> > ---
> > security/lockdown/lockdown.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> > index 4813f168ff93..8d46886d2cca 100644
> > --- a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> > +++ b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> > @@ -161,8 +161,6 @@ static int __init lockdown_secfs_init(void)
> > return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dentry);
> > }
> >
> > -core_initcall(lockdown_secfs_init);
> > -
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM_EARLY
> > DEFINE_EARLY_LSM(lockdown) = {
> > #else
> > @@ -170,4 +168,5 @@ DEFINE_LSM(lockdown) = {
> > #endif
> > .id = &lockdown_lsmid,
> > .init = lockdown_lsm_init,
> > + .initcall_core = lockdown_secfs_init,
> > };
--
paul-moore.com
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list