[PATCH v4 -next 00/15] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into its own files

[Joel Granados]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 09:40:50PM +0800, yukaixiong wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024/12/28 20:15, Joel Granados wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 10:15:19PM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote:
> >> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to
> >> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups.
> >> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its
> >> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table.
...
> >>    sysctl: remove unneeded include
> > This patchset looks strange. There seems to be 15 patches, but there are
> > 30 e-mails in the thread? You can also see this when you look at it in
> > lore [1]. And they are different repeated e-mails (mutt does not
> > de-duplicate them). Also `b4 shazam ...` does not work. What happened?
> > Did you send it twice with the same mail ID? Am I the only one seeing
> > this?
> >
> > I would suggest the following (hopefully you are using b4):
> > 1. Check to see how things will be sent with b4. `b4 send --resend -o OUTPUT_DIR`
> >     If you see 30 emails in that dir from your patchset then something is
> >     still wrong.
> > 2. After you make sure that everything is in order. Do the resend
> >     without bumping the version up (leave it at version 4)
> >
> > Best
> >
> > [1] : https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241223141550.638616-1-yukaixiong@huawei.com/
> 
> I'm very sorry, due to my mistake, 15 patches were sent twice.
No worries. I saw that you have re-sent the patchset and it seems that
this time there is only 15 mails. I see that you are only using my
j.granados at samsung.com ID; can you please add my kernel.org
(joel.granados at kernel.org) mail to the future mails that you send (no
need to re-send v4).

Thx

...

-- 

Joel Granados