[PATCH v5 18/36] locking/local_lock: Include missing headers

[Bart Van Assche]

On 12/19/25 7:40 AM, Marco Elver wrote:
> Including <linux/local_lock.h> into an empty TU will result in the
> compiler complaining:
> 
> ./include/linux/local_lock.h: In function ‘class_local_lock_irqsave_constructor’:
> ./include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:95:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘local_irq_save’; <...>
>     95 |                 local_irq_save(flags);                          \
>        |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> As well as (some architectures only, such as 'sh'):
> 
> ./include/linux/local_lock_internal.h: In function ‘local_lock_acquire’:
> ./include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:33:20: error: ‘current’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>     33 |         l->owner = current;
> 
> Include missing headers to allow including local_lock.h where the
> required headers are not otherwise included.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver at google.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/local_lock_internal.h | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
> index 8f82b4eb542f..1a1ea1232add 100644
> --- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
> @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
>   #endif
>   
>   #include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
> +#include <linux/irqflags.h>
>   #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> +#include <asm/current.h>
>   
>   #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
>   

The abbreviation "TU" is uncommon. Hence, please expand that
abbreviation. Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche at acm.org>