[PATCH] RDMA/uverbs: Consider capability of the process that opens the file

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 12:41:26PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> > From: Serge E. Hallyn <serge at hallyn.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 10:00 PM
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 01:11:27PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 08:14:33AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > Hi Jason,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 09:46:40AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 12:22:36PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > > > > > 1. the create should check
> > > > > > > > ns_capable(current->nsproxy->net->user_ns,
> > > > > > > > CAP_NET_RAW)
> > > > > > > I believe this is sufficient as this create call happens through the
> > ioctl().
> > > > > > > But more question on #3.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think this is the right one to use everywhere.
> > > >
> > > > It's the right one to use when creating resources, but when later
> > > > using them, since below you say that the resource should in fact be
> > > > tied to the creator's network namespace, that means that checking
> > > > current->nsproxy->net->user_ns would have nothing to do with the
> > > > resource being used, right?
> > >
> > > Yes, in that case you'd check something stored in the uobject.
> > 
> > Perfect, that's exactly the kind of thing I was looking for.  Thanks.
> >
> It means uboject create path will refcount and store user_ns, 
> 
> uobject->user_ns = get_user_ns(current->nsproxy->net->user_ns);
> 
> And uobject destroy will do,
> 	put_user_ns(uobject->user_ns).
> 
> This will ensure that in below flow we won't have use_after_free.
> 1. process_A created object in user_ns_A
> 2. process_A shared fd with process_B in user_ns_B
> 3. process_A is killed and
> 4. user_ns_A is free is attempted (free is skipped, until uobject is destroyed by process_B).

We only need to do that if something is legimitately doing capable
from a uobject outside of creation? Did you find that?

And I wonder if using the uobjects affiliated netdev's namespace is
OK?

Jason