[PATCH v2 -next 00/15] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into its own files

yukaixiong yukaixiong at huawei.com
Fri Sep 6 02:35:08 UTC 2024



On 2024/9/4 4:38, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:29:56AM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote:
>> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to
>> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups.
>> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its
>> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table.
>>
>> All the modifications of this patch series base on
>> linux-next(tags/next-20240902). To test this patch series, the code was
>> compiled with both the CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled and disabled on arm64 and
>> x86_64 architectures. After this patch series is applied, all files
>> under /proc/sys/vm can be read or written normally.
> This move make a lot of sense. The question with these multi-subsystem
> patchsets is how do they go into mainline. For now I have added this to
> sysctl-testing to see if it needs more work. I can push this through the
> sysctl subsystem, but you need to get reviewed-by for all of the commits
> in different subsystems. I'm also fine with this going in through some
> other subsys if anyone wants to take it?
>
> Best
>

Thx,Joel!:-)

Hello,everyone!

This patch series has been reviewed by Kees, Jan Kara, Christian 
Brauner, and acked
by Anna Schumaker, Paul Moore. As Joel said, this patch series need to 
get reviewed-by
for all of the commits in different subsystems. I would appreciate it if 
you could review
this patch series as soon as possible !:-)



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list