[PATCH v20 1/6] exec: Add a new AT_CHECK flag to execveat(2)
sergeh at kernel.org
sergeh at kernel.org
Tue Oct 15 03:20:55 UTC 2024
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:39:52AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 10:04:16PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 08:44:17PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > > Add a new AT_CHECK flag to execveat(2) to check if a file would be
> >
> > Apologies for both bikeshedding and missing earlier discussions.
> >
> > But AT_CHECK sounds quite generic. How about AT_EXEC_CHECK, or
> > AT_CHECK_EXEC_CREDS? (I would suggest just AT_CHECK_CREDS since
> > it's for use in execveat(2), but as it's an AT_ flag, it's
> > probably worth being more precise).
>
> As Amir pointed out, we need at least to use the AT_EXECVE_CHECK_
> prefix, and I agree with the AT_EXECVE_CHECK name because it's about
> checking the whole execve request, not sepcifically a "creds" part.
Well, not the whole. You are explicitly not checking the validity of the
files.
But ok. With that,
Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <sergeh at kernel.org>
thanks,
-serge
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list