[PATCH 1/3] ima: Remove inode lock
Roberto Sassu
roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com
Wed Oct 9 16:25:45 UTC 2024
On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 11:37 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 11:36 AM Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:57 PM Roberto Sassu
> > <roberto.sassu at huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
> > >
> > > Move out the mutex in the ima_iint_cache structure to a new structure
> > > called ima_iint_cache_lock, so that a lock can be taken regardless of
> > > whether or not inode integrity metadata are stored in the inode.
> > >
> > > Introduce ima_inode_security() to simplify accessing the new structure in
> > > the inode security blob.
> > >
> > > Move the mutex initialization and annotation in the new function
> > > ima_inode_alloc_security() and introduce ima_iint_lock() and
> > > ima_iint_unlock() to respectively lock and unlock the mutex.
> > >
> > > Finally, expand the critical region in process_measurement() guarded by
> > > iint->mutex up to where the inode was locked, use only one iint lock in
> > > __ima_inode_hash(), since the mutex is now in the inode security blob, and
> > > replace the inode_lock()/inode_unlock() calls in ima_check_last_writer().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 26 ++++++++---
> > > security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 4 +-
> > > security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 39 +++++++---------
> > > 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >
> > I'm not an IMA expert, but it looks reasonable to me, although
> > shouldn't this carry a stable CC in the patch metadata?
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul at paul-moore.com>
>
> Sorry, one more thing ... did you verify this patchset resolves the
> syzbot problem? I saw at least one reproducer.
Uhm, could not reproduce the deadlock with the reproducer. However,
without the patch I have a lockdep warning, and with I don't.
I asked syzbot to try the patches. Let's see.
Thanks
Roberto
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list