[PATCH v21 6/6] samples/check-exec: Add an enlighten "inc" interpreter and 28 tests

Mickaël Salaün mic at digikod.net
Fri Nov 22 14:50:56 UTC 2024


On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 03:34:47PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Mickaël,
> 
> On Tue, 2024-11-12 at 20:18 +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > 
> > +
> > +/* Returns 1 on error, 0 otherwise. */
> > +static int interpret_stream(FILE *script, char *const script_name,
> > +			    char *const *const envp, const bool restrict_stream)
> > +{
> > +	int err;
> > +	char *const script_argv[] = { script_name, NULL };
> > +	char buf[128] = {};
> > +	size_t buf_size = sizeof(buf);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We pass a valid argv and envp to the kernel to emulate a native
> > +	 * script execution.  We must use the script file descriptor instead of
> > +	 * the script path name to avoid race conditions.
> > +	 */
> > +	err = execveat(fileno(script), "", script_argv, envp,
> > +		       AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_EXECVE_CHECK);
> 
> At least with v20, the AT_CHECK always was being set, independent of whether
> set-exec.c set it.  I'll re-test with v21.

AT_EXECVE_CEHCK should always be set, only the interpretation of the
result should be relative to securebits.  This is highlighted in the
documentation.

> 
> thanks,
> 
> Mimi
> 
> > +	if (err && restrict_stream) {
> > +		perror("ERROR: Script execution check");
> > +		return 1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Reads script. */
> > +	buf_size = fread(buf, 1, buf_size - 1, script);
> > +	return interpret_buffer(buf, buf_size);
> > +}
> > +
> 
> 



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list