[PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM

Kent Overstreet kent.overstreet at linux.dev
Fri Nov 22 06:51:39 UTC 2024


On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 04:53:48PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 11/20/24 21:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:47:59PM -0800, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:55:03PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > Shuah, would you be willing to entertain the notion of modifying your...
> > > 
> > > Kent, I'd like to gently remind you that Shuah is not speaking in her
> > > personal capacity, but as a representative of the Code of Conduct
> > > Committee[1], as she has noted in her signature.  The Code of Conduct
> > > Committee is appointed by, and reports to, the TAB[2], which is an
> > > elected body composed of kernel developers and maintainers.
> > 
> > FYI, without taking any stance on the issue under debate here, I find the
> > language used by Shuah on behalf of the Code of Conduct committee
> > extremely patronising and passive aggressive.  This might be because I
> > do not have an American academic class background, but I would suggest
> > that the code of conduct committee should educate itself about
> > communicating without projecting this implicit cultural and class bias
> > so blatantly.
> 
> I tend to use formal style when I speak on behalf of the Code of Conduct
> committee. I would label it as very formal bordering on pedantic.
> Would you prefer less formal style in the CoC communication?

Personally, it's always easier to take requests from a human, than a
faceless process that I have no input into.

I'll always rebell against the latter, but I'll always work to help out
or make things right with people in the community.



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list