[PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
Kent Overstreet
kent.overstreet at linux.dev
Wed Nov 20 23:57:41 UTC 2024
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:47:59PM -0800, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:55:03PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Shuah, would you be willing to entertain the notion of modifying your...
>
> Kent, I'd like to gently remind you that Shuah is not speaking in her
> personal capacity, but as a representative of the Code of Conduct
> Committee[1], as she has noted in her signature. The Code of Conduct
> Committee is appointed by, and reports to, the TAB[2], which is an
> elected body composed of kernel developers and maintainers.
>
> [1] https://www.kernel.org/code-of-conduct.html
> [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.html
>
> Speaking purely in a personal capacity, and not as a member of the TAB
> (although I do serve as vice-chair of that body) I am extremely
> grateful of the work of Shuah and her colleages (listed in [1]). I
> believe that their work is important in terms of establishing guard
> rails regarding the minimum standards of behavior in our community.
>
> If you look at the git history of the kernel sources, you will see
> that a large number of your fellow maintainers assented to this
> approach --- for example by providing their Acked-by in commit
> 1279dbeed36f ("Code of Conduct Interpretation: Add document explaining
> how the Code of Conduct is to be interpreted").
Authored by Shuah, so I do seem to be talking to the correct person.
Regardless, we talked privately about opening some sort of public
discussion, this is pursuant to that.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list