[PATCH RFT 00/16] perf tools: Use generic syscall scripts for all archs
Charlie Jenkins
charlie at rivosinc.com
Mon Nov 4 21:32:53 UTC 2024
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:13:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024, at 22:06, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > Standardize the generation of syscall headers around syscall tables.
> > Previously each architecture independently selected how syscall headers
> > would be generated, or would not define a way and fallback onto
> > libaudit. Convert all architectures to use a standard syscall header
> > generation script and allow each architecture to override the syscall
> > table to use if they do not use the generic table.
> >
> > As a result of these changes, no architecture will require libaudit, and
> > so the fallback case of using libaudit is removed by this series.
> >
> > Testing:
> >
> > I have tested that the syscall mappings of id to name generation works
> > as expected for every architecture, but I have only validated that perf
> > trace compiles and runs as expected on riscv, arm64, and x86_64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie at rivosinc.com>
>
> Thanks for doing this, I had plans to do this myself, but hadn't
> completed that bit so far. I'm travelling at the moment, so I'm
> not sure I have time to look at it in enough detail this week.
>
> One problem I ran into doing this previously was the incompatible
> format of the tables for x86 and s390, which have conflicting
> interpretations of what the '-' character means. It's possible
> that this is only really relevant for the in-kernel table,
> not the version in tools.
>
I don't think that is an issue for this usecase because the only
information that is taken from the syscall table is the number and the
name of the syscall. '-' doesn't appear in either of these columns!
- Charlie
> Arnd
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list