[RFC 0/9] Nginx refcount scalability issue with Apparmor enabled and potential solutions

[John Johansen]

On 5/24/24 14:10, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:09 PM John Johansen
> <john.johansen at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/2/24 02:23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>> On 2/9/24, John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2/6/24 20:40, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>>>> Gentle ping.
>>>>>
>>>>> John,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please confirm that:
>>>>>
>>>>> a. The AppArmor refcount usage described in the RFC is correct?
>>>>> b. Approach taken to fix the scalability issue is valid/correct?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Neeraj,
>>>>
>>>> I know your patchset has been waiting on review for a long time.
>>>> Unfortunately I have been very, very busy lately. I will try to
>>>> get to it this weekend, but I can't promise that I will be able
>>>> to get the review fully done.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Gentle prod.
>>>
>>> Any chances of this getting reviewed in the foreseeable future? Would
>>> be a real bummer if the patchset fell through the cracks.
>>>
>>
>> yes, sorry I have been unavailable for the last couple of weeks. I am
>> now back, I have a rather large backlog to try catching up on but this
>> is has an entry on the list.
>>
> 
> So where do we stand here?
> 
sorry I am still trying to dig out of my backlog, I will look at this,
this weekend.