kernel crash in mknod
Christian Brauner
brauner at kernel.org
Tue Mar 26 11:40:20 UTC 2024
> we can change the parameter of security_path_post_mknod() from
> dentry to inode?
If all current callers only operate on the inode then it seems the best
to only pass the inode. If there's some reason someone later needs a
dentry the hook can always be changed.
For bigger changes it's also worthwhile if the object that's passed down
into the hook-based LSM layer is as specific as possible. If someone
does a change that affects lifetime rules of mounts then any hook that
takes a struct path argument that's unused means going through each LSM
that implements the hook only to find out it's not actually used.
Similar for dentry vs inode imho.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list