[RFC 0/9] Nginx refcount scalability issue with Apparmor enabled and potential solutions
John Johansen
john.johansen at canonical.com
Fri Mar 8 20:09:48 UTC 2024
On 3/2/24 02:23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On 2/9/24, John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com> wrote:
>> On 2/6/24 20:40, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>> Gentle ping.
>>>
>>> John,
>>>
>>> Could you please confirm that:
>>>
>>> a. The AppArmor refcount usage described in the RFC is correct?
>>> b. Approach taken to fix the scalability issue is valid/correct?
>>>
>>
>> Hi Neeraj,
>>
>> I know your patchset has been waiting on review for a long time.
>> Unfortunately I have been very, very busy lately. I will try to
>> get to it this weekend, but I can't promise that I will be able
>> to get the review fully done.
>>
>
> Gentle prod.
>
> Any chances of this getting reviewed in the foreseeable future? Would
> be a real bummer if the patchset fell through the cracks.
>
yes, sorry I have been unavailable for the last couple of weeks. I am
now back, I have a rather large backlog to try catching up on but this
is has an entry on the list.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list